What are Inhibitors to Progress in Medical Technology in 2022?
1. Introduction to Inhibitors to Progress in Medical Technology in 2022
Following up on my previous post (which you can find here) I thought I would share more of the research I’ve been doing on medical technology and what is inhibiting progress in 2022.
A lot of this is based on work done with a variety of research groups around the world. There are some areas where we have not yet been able to quantify their impact. This is not to say that these areas aren’t important, but it does mean that our estimates may be a little off when we try to make comparisons between different countries.
I have only talked about the US, but this will be extended to include other large countries in the future. Our main research questions are:
• How many medical devices do we use yearly?
• How many health care consumers do we serve?
This question is rather intuitive — it seems like it should be easy enough to find an answer for each group and compare them across time, right? Unfortunately, all we can say with certainty is that there will be more medical devices used yearly than people served by the health care sector, assuming that advances in medical technology continue at the same pace as they did over the last few decades (the incremental improvement in life expectancy and general health status just makes this outcome seem inevitable). Since most of our data come from actuarial studies (which excludes outliers), this means that estimates of how many Americans use medical devices are likely far too high and how many Americans are served by the health care sector are likely way too low — which leads us to ask two additional questions:
• How long has this trend been going on?
• How long has the US population increased?
The larger question we wish we could answer is: What will happen if our work continues at its current pace for a couple of hundred years? This leads us to a third question: What will happen if all technologies continue at their current pace for another 100 years and beyond (assuming no major breakthroughs occur)? A lot of people think that advancing technologies like computers and semiconductors lead directly to improved human health over time; while others believe they instead stimulate technological advancement itself — which leads us to a fourth question: What will happen if all technologies continue at their current pace for another 1,000 years and beyond?
My reasons for writing about these things are quite simple: If you believe something (like I do) then you should acknowledge it openly; if you don’t know something or think something else then
2. Prevention of Inhibitors
Given how much progress has been made, in all sectors of the economy and in all markets, it is surprising that there are still so many fronts where scientists can’t solve one of the most important problems facing humanity — cancer. This is particularly true for cancer which affects more than 100 million people worldwide and kills more than 70,000 people every day.
It’s a disease that has been around for thousands of years, and an epidemic that is only now starting to be addressed.
But it is not just a question of research; a lot of it comes down to regulatory barriers which make it very hard for biotech companies to bring innovative products to market. New approaches need to be tested and approved before they can be released into the marketplace; but once on the market, products must then face millions of dollars worth of marketing costs (which must be paid by the company themselves), which further leads to intense pressure on those companies that are able to get products through the regulatory process (which can take years).
A lot was written about this problem in my last post, but today I want to look at what might be done about it: if we can figure out ways by which promising vaccines can be brought through regulatory processes as quickly as possible — and even faster if we could solve some of these other problems — then this problem will finally become a thing of the past.
3. The Importance of Medical Technology for Society
There are two broad categories of medical technology. The first is the set of products and services that are being developed today, that are still in the early stages of development (the products will be ready at some point after 2022). The second is a broader category that includes products and services which have been developed but not made to market yet (e.g., there are devices in the market today, but they aren’t ready for widespread use).
These categories differ quite a bit from one another: for example, there may be no medical device currently in use, but it could be in the pipeline.
We’re seeing both of these categories of medical technology grow significantly over the next decade. For example, we know nearly nothing about what could be done with artificial intelligence (AI) within our lifetimes; however, a couple of years from now AI-based technologies might be used to treat or cure human diseases. This raises two questions: what are the technologies needed to achieve this goal? And how do we get them into people’s hands?
The answer to these questions depends on what needs preventing progress in medical technology and on who has the interest and access to funding to make those technologies available.
4. The Rise of Medical Technology in the Next Decade
Medical technology is advancing at an exponential rate and generally speaking, that rate of advancement is contained within a few years. We’ve already seen the medical industry mature in one key area: the capabilities of diagnostic tools.
A few years ago, the medical industry was still very much in its infancy and not many people were even aware that the term “disease” existed. As a result, most doctors would diagnose any given illness with one of three or four words: “I think it is all in my head, but I can’t really say for sure” or “this person has cancer” or “I can’t rule out a heart attack.” The new set of diagnostic tools has enabled doctors to teach themselves about diseases and symptoms from scratch — something far more sophisticated than what we currently use to diagnose illnesses in general.
With the advent of these new diagnostic tools, it became possible for doctors to analyze their work more thoroughly and find more effective ways of treating patients than could have been done before. Also read kinemaster mod. This led to many hospitalizations being cut down (in some cases by up to 95%), along with an increase in quality care (which has allowed us all to spend less time waiting in long lines at hospitals).
This is just a very small example of how medical technology powers innovation and progress in medicine today; but it also illustrates how disease goes from being just a bad story in a patient’s life — which you can largely ignore — into something that can be used as part of your daily life, leading to better health outcomes for everyone involved.
5. Inhibitors to Medical Technology Progress in 2022
We have made a lot of progress in medical technology in recent years and it has been great. But there are still some things that may be inhibiting progress, and I am going to describe three of them.
A number of years ago, an academician named Peter Diamandis and his brother Steven Diamandis (who was then a student at Harvard University) wrote a popular book about the state of the art in space exploration. Also read cod mobile hack. The book got a lot of attention and turned into a phenomenon: people read it cover to cover, took notes, wrote follow-up comments, and started buying copies, even though they didn’t all agree with everything they said in the book.
The main reason for this response was that there was something new to learn here: we were learning more about space exploration than we had ever done before! Also read diabolic traffic bot. This led many people to think that there must be something not yet understood here that is inhibiting progress, but this is not true: only one or two things are really inhibiting resistance to space travel right now (the reason we don’t go into space yet is that people don’t want to go into space yet). These three things are:
(1) The general public does not feel like space is a pursuit worth pursuing
(2) Space travel does not appear as exciting or entertaining as it should,
(3) Space travel appears too expensive (compared to other fields).
In the last decade, we have seen a tremendous burst of medical innovation. The rise of genetics and genomics, in particular, has led to a revolution in how we think about how we can improve health. We are now seeing more people than ever before making their living off of medical research. This is still a young field and there are many different areas of medical technology that still lack major breakthroughs, but over the next few years, there will be just as many innovations in medicine as we have today.
I am not going to claim this will happen overnight, but I am confident it will happen within the next 10 years. If you want to know why read this excellent article by Mike Huber that talks about where medicine is heading before the process starts and where it’s headed after the process finishes.
But what about tomorrow? What about 2022?
In this post, I try to give you some insight into where things are going from here: what are inhibitors to progress in medical technology in 2022?